w88优德备用地址

“第一次上英语课时,觉得英语特别好听。  中央纪委有关负责人指出,党的十八大以来,落实中央八项规定精神、纠正“四风”取得显著成效,但作风建设依然任重道远。

本文由Mr.Hsieh授权爱思w88优德备用网站发布,转载请注明出处和作者,翻译来自机翻,仅供参考


Topic:

Some people think that schools should stop teaching students by using books because students find them boring, and that children can learn from films, TV, video games and computer instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Essay:

Today’s students may see themselves growing up in a learning environment surrounded by digital screens rather than print books. An increasing number of schools acknowledge the growing influence of technology and have responded in kind by teaching students through films, TV, video games and computer instead of books on paper. Without downplaying the many advantages of learning from screens, there are significant consequences to discounting the value of leaning from books.

 

To begin with, there is a popular assumption that schools should stop teaching students by using books because younger people find books boring. This assumption seems to already have had an impact on book resourcing decisions at many schools, with some schools probably choosing to stop using paper books from classes in response to a perceived greater preference for screens. That is to say, schools in general are motivated to increase screen use across every subject area in the academic curriculum, and the trend will continue unabated. It is also assumed that students’ preference for screens rather than books would translate into better learning outcomes. Like it or not, the proliferation of screens is here to stay, so schools need to get on board and accept that. Besides, there is no denying the fact that the use of screens saves resources, in addition to  protecting the Earth, for that matter.

 

However, the use of books at schools is down but not out. Although new forms of classroom technology like digital textbooks are more accessible and portable, it would be wrong to assume  that students are automatically better served by digital reading just because they prefer it. In theory, students might say they could perform better when reading on screens, but in practice their actual performance could suffer. Research suggests that overall comprehension may be better for print versus digital reading, which means that schools should not underestimate the vale of using books even in an increasingly digital world. In this respect, teachers could make students aware that their ability to comprehend the texts may be influenced by the medium they choose, but there is no benefit in selecting screens over books. There are reasons to go paperless, of course; but there is clearly something significant that would be lost with print’s demise.

 

In conclusion, for school children, the benefits of learning from screens are obvious, nevertheless it is important not to entirely exclude learning from print materials. Books could be boring sometimes, so are screens. After all, there should always be a place for print in students’ academic lives—no matter how technologically savvy they become. 


主题:


有些人认为学校应该停止用书本来教学生,因为学生觉得书很无聊,孩子们可以从电影、电视、电子游戏和电脑中学习。你在多大程度上同意或不同意?给出你的答案的原因,并包括任何相关的例子,从你自己的知识或经验。


论文:


今天的学生可能认为自己是在一个被数字屏幕而不是印刷书籍包围的学习环境中长大的。越来越多的学校承认科技的影响越来越大,并通过电影、电视、电子游戏和电脑而不是书本来对学生进行实物教学。在不贬低从屏幕上学习的诸多好处的前提下,低估从书本中学习的价值也会产生重大后果。


首先,有一个流行的假设,学校应该停止用书本来教学生,因为年轻人觉得书本很无聊。这种假设似乎已经对许多学校的图书资源选择产生了影响,一些学校可能会选择停止在课堂上使用纸质图书,以回应人们对屏幕的更大偏好。也就是说,学校一般都有动力在学术课程的各个学科领域增加屏幕的使用,而且这种趋势将会持续下去。人们还认为,学生对屏幕而非书本的偏好,会转化为更好的学习成果。不管你喜不喜欢,屏幕的普及将会持续下去,所以学校需要接受这个事实。此外,不可否认的事实,使用屏幕节约资源,除了保护地球,在这方面。


然而,学校的用书数量减少了,但并没有减少。虽然像数字教科书这样的新型课堂技术更容易获取和携带,但如果仅仅因为学生喜欢数字阅读,就认为他们会自动得到更好的服务,那就大错特错了。理论上,学生们可能会说,他们在屏幕上阅读时的表现会更好,但实际上,他们的实际表现可能会受到影响。研究表明,与数字阅读相比,纸质阅读的整体理解能力更强,这意味着学校不应该低估在日益数字化的世界里使用书籍的价值。在这方面,教师可以让学生意识到他们理解课文的能力可能会受到他们选择的媒介的影响,但是选择屏幕而不是书本没有好处。当然,无纸化是有原因的;但显然,随着印刷术的消亡,一些重要的东西将会消失。


总之,对于学生来说,从屏幕上学习的好处是显而易见的,但重要的是不要把学习完全排除在印刷材料之外。书有时会很无聊,屏幕也是。毕竟,在学生的学术生活中总应该有一个发表文章的地方——不管他们在技术上多么精通。